Team, Visitors, External Collaborators
Overall Objectives
Research Program
Application Domains
Highlights of the Year
New Software and Platforms
New Results
Bilateral Contracts and Grants with Industry
Partnerships and Cooperations
XML PDF e-pub
PDF e-Pub

Section: New Results

Parallel Composition and Modular Verification of Computer Controlled Systems in Differential Dynamic Logic

Participants : Jean-Pierre Talpin, Benoit Boyer, David Mentre, Simon Lunel, Stefan Mitsch.

The primary goal of our project, in collaboration with Mitsubishi Electronics Research Centre Europe (MERCE), is to ensure correctness-by-design in realistic cyber-physical systems, i.e., systems that mix software and hardware in a physical environment, e.g., Mitsubishi factory automation lines or water-plant factory. To achieve that, we develop a verification methodology based on the decomposition of systems into components enhanced with compositional contract reasoning.

The work of A. Platzer on Differential Dynamic Logic (d) held our attention (Differential Dynamic Logic for Hybrid Systems, André Platzer, This formalism is built upon the Dynamic Logic of V. Pratt and augmented with the possibility of expressing Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs). Combined with the ability of Dynamic Logic to specify and verify hybrid programs, d is particularly adapted to model cyber-physical systems. The proof system associated with the logic is implemented into the theorem prover KeYmaera X. Aimed toward automation, it is a promising tool to spread formal methods in industry.

Computer-Controlled Systems (CCS) are a subclass of hybrid systems where the periodic relation of control components to time is of paramount importance. Since they additionally are at the heart of many safety-critical devices, it is of primary importance to correctly model such systems and to ensure they function correctly according to safety requirements. Differential dynamic logic d is a powerful logic to model hybrid systems and to prove their correctness. We contributed a compositional modeling and reasoning framework to d that separates models into components with timing guarantees, such as reactivity of controllers and controllability of continuous dynamics. Components operate in parallel, with coarse-grained interleaving, periodic execution and communication. We present techniques to automate system safety proofs from isolated, modular, and possibly mechanized proofs of component properties parameterized with timing characteristics.