Bibliography

Major publications by the team in recent years

[1]

C. Bassac.
Principes de morphologie anglaise, Linguistica, Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2004.

[2]

C. Bassac.
Morphologie et Information Lexicale, Mémoire d'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherche, Université Michel de Montaigne Bordeaux 3, Décembre 2006.

[3]

L. Clément, A. Kinyon.
Generating parallel multilingual LFG-TAG grammars from a MetaGrammar, in: Proc. of ACL'03, 2003.

[4]

K. Gerdes.
Topologie et grammaires formelles de l'allemand, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris 7, 2002.

[5]

G. Huet.
Transducers as lexicon morphisms, phonemic segmentation by euphony analysis, application to a sanskrit tagger, in: Journal of Functional Programming, 2005
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~huet/PUBLIC/tagger.ps.

[6]

A. Lecomte.
Categorial Grammar for Minimalism, in: Logic and Grammar, C. Casadio, P. Scott, R. Seely (editors), CSLI, 2005.

[7]

R. Moot.
Proof nets for linguistic analysis, Ph. D. Thesis, UIL-OTS, Universiteit Utrecht, 2002.

[8]

H. Portine.
La syntaxe de Damourette et Pichon comme outil de représentation du sens, in: Modèles linguistiques, 2002, vol. 23, n^o 2, p. 21–46.

[9]

C. Retoré.
Logique linéaire et syntaxe des langues, Mémoire d'habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université de Nantes, Janvier 2002.

[10]

C. Retoré, E. Stabler.
Generative Grammar in Resource Logics, in: Journal of Research on Language and Computation, 2004, vol. 2, n^o 1, p. 3–25.

[11]

B. Sagot.
Analyse automatique du français: lexiques, formalismes, analyseurs, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris 7, april 2006.

Publications of the year

Books and Monographs

[12]

K. Gerdes, C. Muller (editors)
Ordre des mots et topologie de la phrase française, 2006, vol. 29, p. 1-10.

Doctoral dissertations and Habilitation theses

[13]

C. Bassac.
Morphologie et Information Lexicale, Mémoire d'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherche, Université Michel de Montaigne Bordeaux 3, Décembre 2006.

[14]

R. Bonato.
An Integrated Computational Approach to Binding Theory, Tesi di Dottorato di Ricerca and Thèse de Doctorat, Università degli Studi di Verona and Université Bordeaux I, May 2006.

[15]

M.-L. Guénot.
Eléments de grammaire du français pour une théorie descriptive et formelle de la langue, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Provence, Aix en Provence, Décembre 2006.

[16]

P. Guitteny.
Le passif en langue des signes, Thèse de doctorat, Université Michel de Montaigne Bordeaux 3, Décembre 2006.

Articles in refereed journals and book chapters

[17]

C. Bassac.
A compositional treatment for English compounds, in: Research in Language, september 2006.

[18]

C. Bassac.
Un problème de morphologie flexionnelle: l'apposition coordinative en anglais, in: Cahiers de grammaire, september 2006.

[19]

D. Bechet, R. Bonato, A. Dikovsky, A. Foret, Y. Le Nir, E. Moreau, I. Tellier.
Modèles algorithmiques de l'acquisition de la syntaxe : concepts et méthodes, résultats et problèmes, in: Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, To appear, 2007.

[20]

K. Gerdes.
Sur la non-équivalence des représentations syntaxiques : comment la représentation en X-barre nous amène au concept du mouvement, in: Cahiers de grammaire, 2006, vol. 30.

[21]

K. Gerdes, S. Kahane.
L'amas verbal au coeur dune modélisation topologique du francais, in: Linguisticae Investigationes, 2006, vol. 29, p. 75-89.

[22]

K. Gerdes, C. Muller.
Présentation, in: Linguisticae Investigationes, 2006, vol. 29, p. 1-10.

[23]

P. Guitteny.
Langue, pidgin et identité, in: Glottopol, 2006, vol. 7, p. 128-143
http://www.univ-rouen.fr/dyalang/glottopol.

[24]

G. Huet.
Lexicon-directed Segmentation and Tagging of Sanskrit, in: Themes and Tasks in Old and Middle Indo-Aryan Linguistics, Delhi, B. Tikkanen, H. Hettrich (editors), Motilal Banarsidass, 2006, p. 307–325.

[25]

G. Huet.
Vérité Mathématique, cohérence logique et vérification informatique, in: Cahiers du Mouvement Universel de la Responsabilité Scientifique, 2006, vol. 49, n^o 3, p. 42–61.

[26]

R. Moot, C. Retoré.
Les indices pronominaux du francais dans les grammaires catégorielles, in: Linguisticae Investigationes, 2006, vol. 29, p. 137-146.

[27]

C. Retoré.
Les mathématiques de la linguistique computationnelle – premier volet: la théorie des langages, in: La Gazette des Mathématiciens, To appear, 2007.

[28]

É. Voisin, L. Kervajan.
Typologie des verbes et forme verbale non marquée en Langue des Signes Française : incidences sur l'organisation syntaxique, in: Silexicales, To appear, 2007.

[29]

É. Voisin.
Manifestations syntaxiques de la diglossie : le cas du Français Signé, in: RELQ / QSJL Revue des étudiants en linguistique du Québec / Quebec Student Journal of Lingusitics, 2006.

[30]

É. Voisin.
Les formes verbales non finies en Langue des Signes Française, in: Les formes non finies du verbe, F. Lambert (editor), To appear, Presses Universitaie de Rennes, 2007.

Publications in Conferences and Workshops

[31]

M. Amblard.
Treating clitics with minimalist grammars, in: Formal Grammar, Malaga, 2006.

[32]

M. Amblard, H. Anoun, A. Lecomte.
Ellipse et coordination dans les grammaires de type logique, in: Journée Sémantique et Modélisation, 2006.

[33]

M. Amblard, G. Kobele, C. Retoré.
La linguistique computationnelle entre traitement automatique des langues et sciences cognitives, in: Colloque de l'Association pour la Recherche Cognitive, Poster, 2006.

[34]

H. Anoun.
Towards a logical analysis of nominal sentences in Standard Arabic, in: European Summer School in Logic Language and Information ESSLLI, student session, 2006.

[35]

H. Anoun, A. Lecomte.
Logical Grammars with Emptiness, in: Formal Grammar, 2006, p. 15–29.

[36]

L. Clément, K. Gerdes.
Analyzing Zeugmas In XLFG, in: LFG conference, 2006.

[37]

L. Danlos, B. Sagot, S.-A. Susanne.
French frozen verbal expressions: from lexicon-grammar tables to NLP applications, in: Actes du Colloque Lexique et Grammaire 2006, Palermo, Italy, 2006.

[38]

K. Gerdes, S. Kahane.
A polynomial parsing algorithm for the topological model. Synchronizing Constituent and Dependency Grammars, Illustrated by German Word Order Phenomena, in: 44th meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2006, 2006.

[39]

G. Huet, B. Razet.
The Reactive Engine for Modular Transducers, in: Algebra, Meaning and Computation, Essays Dedicated to Joseph A. Goguen on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, K. Futatsugi, J.-P. Jouannaud, J. Meseguer (editors), LNCS, Springer, 2006, vol. 4060, p. 355–374.

[40]

R. Moot.
Automated Extraction of Type-Logical Supertags from the Spoken Dutch Corpus, in: The Complexity of Lexical Descriptions and its Relevance to Natural Language Processing: A Supertagging Approach, S. Bangalore, A. Joshi (editors), To appear, MIT Press, 2007.

[41]

R. Moot.
Automated Extraction of Type-Logical Supertags from the Spoken Dutch Corpus, in: The Complexity of Lexical Descriptions and its Relevance to Natural Language Processing: A Supertagging Approach, S. Bangalore, A. Joshi (editors), To appear, MIT Press, 2007.

[42]

B. Sagot, É. de La Clergerie.
Error mining in parsing results, in: Proceedings of ACL-CoLing 06, Sydney, Australia, 2006, p. 329–336.

[43]

D. Seddah, B. Sagot.
Modeling and Analysis of Elliptic Coordination by Dynamic Exploitation of Derivation Forests in LTAG parsing, in: Proceedings of TAG+8, Sydney, Australia, 2006, p. 147-152.

[44]

É. Voisin.
Langue des Signes Française et Français Signé : frontière et grammaticalité, in: Actes du colloque international des étudiants chercheurs en didactique des langues et en linguistique, Grenoble, 2006.

Internal Reports

[45]

R. Bonato.
A Study on Learnability for Rigid Lambek Grammars, Research Report, INRIA, 08 2006, n^o 5964
https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00088818.

[46]

B. Mery, M. Amblard, I. Durand, C. Retoré.
A Case Study of the Convergence of Mildly Context-Sensitive Formalisms for Natural Language Syntax: from Minimalist Grammars to Multiple Context-Free Grammars", Technical report, INRIA, 2006, n^o 6042
https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00117306.

References in notes

[47]

G. Bouma, E. Hinrichs, G.-J. M. Kruijff, R. Oehrle (editors)
Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Sema ntics, distributed by Cambridge University Press, CSLI, 1999.

[48]

P. de Groote, G. Morrill, C. Retoré (editors)
Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, LACL`2001, LNCS/LNAI, Springer-Verlag, 2001, n^o 2099.

[49]

M. Moortgat (editor)
Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, LACL`98, selected papers, LNCS/LNAI, Springer-Verlag, 2001, n^o 2014.

[50]

C. Retoré (editor)
Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, LACL`96, LNCS/LNAI, Springer-Verlag, 1997, vol. 1328.

[51]

C. Retoré, E. Stabler (editors)
Special Issue on Resource Logics and Minimalist Grammars, Kluwer, 2004, vol. 2(1).

[52]

G. Rozenberg, A. Salomaa (editors)
Handbook of Formal Languages, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1997.

[53]

R. Thomason (editor)
The collected papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, 1974.

[54]

J. van Benthem, A. ter Meulen (editors)
Handbook of Logic and Language, North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997.

[55]

K. R. Beesley, L. Karttunen.
Finite-State Morphology: Xerox Tools and Techniques, Cambridge University Press, 2002.

[56]

R. Bernardi, R. Moot.
Generalized Quantifiers in Declarative and Interrogative Sentences., in: Logic Journal of the IGPL, 2003, vol. 11, n^o 4, p. 419-434.

[57]

P. Blache.
Property Grammars: A Fully Constraint-based Theory, in: Constraint Satisfaction and Language Processing, H. Christiansen, P. Skadhauge, J. Villadsen (editors), Springer, 2005.

[58]

N. Chomsky.
Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.

[59]

N. Chomsky.
The minimalist program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.

[60]

P. de Groote, C. Retoré.
Semantic readings of proof nets, in: Formal Grammar, Prague, G.-J. Kruijff, G. Morrill, D. Oehrle (editors), FoLLI, 1996, p. 57–70.

[61]

A. Dikovsky, L. Modina.
Dependencies on the other side of the Curtain, in: Traitement Automatique des Langues, 2000, vol. 41, n^o 1, p. 67-95.

[62]

L. T. F. Gamut.
Logic, Language and Meaning – Volume 2: Intensional logic and logical grammar, The University of Chicago Press, 1991.

[63]

M.-L. Guénot, P. Blache.
A descriptive and formal perspective for grammar development, in: Workshop on Foundations of Natural-Language Grammars, Edimbourg, Royaume-Uni, 2005.

[64]

G. Huet.
Linear Contexts and the Sharing Functor: Techniques for Symbolic Computation., in: Thirty Five Years of Automating Mathematics, F. Kamareddine (editor), Kluwer, 2003
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~huet/PUBLIC/DB.pdf.

[65]

G. Huet.
Zen and the Art of Symbolic Computing: Light and Fast Applicative Algorithms for Computational Linguistics, in: Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages (PADL) symposium, New Orleans, Invited lecture, 2003
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~huet/PUBLIC/padl.pdf.

[66]

G. Huet.
Design of a Computational Linguistics Platform for Sanskrit, in: Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, LACL 05, Invited Lecture, 2005.

[67]

G. Huet.
Transducers as lexicon morphisms, phonemic segmentation by euphony analysis, application to a sanskrit tagger, in: Journal of Functional Programming, 2005
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~huet/PUBLIC/tagger.ps.

[68]

G. Huet.
Un système de traitement informatique du sanskrit, in: Journé e ATALA: Traitement Automatique des Langues Anciennes, Invited Lecture, 2005.

[69]

R. Jackendoff.
The Architecture of the Language Faculty, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995, n^o 28.

[70]

A. Joshi, L. Levy, M. Takahashi.
Tree Adjunct Grammar, in: Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1975, vol. 10, p. 136–163.

[71]

A. Joshi, Y. Schabes.
Tree Adjoining Grammars, in: Handbook of Formal Languages, Berlin, G. Rozenberg, A. Salomaa (editors), Springer Verlag, 1996, vol. 3, chap. 2.

[72]

A. Joshi, K. Vijay-Shanker, D. Weir.
The convergence of mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms, in: Fundational issues in natural language processing, P. Sells, S. Schieber, T. Wasow (editors), MIT Press, 1991.

[73]

H. Kamp, U. Reyle.
From Discourse to Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1993.

[74]

R. M. Kaplan, M. Kay.
Regular Models of Phonological Rule Systems, in: Computational Linguistics, 1994, vol. 20,3, p. 331–378.

[75]

L. Karttunen.
Applications of Finite-State Transducers in Natural Language Processing, in: Proceedings, CIAA-2000, 2000.

[76]

K. Koskenniemi.
A general computational model for word-form recognition and production, in: 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1984.

[77]

A. Lecomte, C. Retoré.
Extending Lambek grammars: a logical account of minimalist grammars, in: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2001, Toulouse, ACL, July 2001, p. 354–361.

[78]

A. Lecomte, C. Retoré.
Towards a Minimal Logic for Minimalist Grammars: a Transformational Use of Lambek Calculus, in: Formal Grammar, FG`99, FoLLI, 1999, p. 83–92.

[79]

D. Lillo-Martin, E. S. Klima.
Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory, in: Theoretical issues in sign language research – Vol 1 Linguistics, S. D. Fisher, P. Siple (editors), University of Chicago Press, 1990, p. 191–210.

[80]

D. Lillo-Martin.
Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the Null Argument Parameters, Kluwer, 1991.

[81]

C. Manning, H. Schutze.
Foundations of statistical natural language processing, MIT Press, 1999.

[82]

I. Melcuk.
Communicative Organization in Natural Language: The Semantic-communicative Structure of Sentences, John Benjamins, 2001.

[83]

I. Melcuk.
Dependency syntax – theory and practice, Linguistics, State University of New York Press, 1988.

[84]

J. Michaelis.
Derivational minimalism is mildly context sensitive, in: Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, LACL`98, selected papers, M. Moortgat (editor), LNCS/LNAI, Springer-Verlag, 2001, n^o 2014, p. 179–198.

[85]

U. Mönnich, J. Michaelis, F. Morawietz.
On Minimalist Attribute Grammars and Macro Tree Transducers, in: Linguistic Form and its Computation, C. Rohrer, A. Rossdeutscher, H. Kamp (editors), CSLI Publications, 2004.

[86]

M. Moortgat.
Categorial Type Logic, in: Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam, J. van Benthem, A. ter Meulen (editors), North-Holland Elsevier, 1996, chap. 2, p. 93–177.

[87]

R. Moot.
Proof nets for linguistic analysis, Ph. D. Thesis, UIL-OTS, Universiteit Utrecht, 2002.

[88]

R. Moot.
Grail, Technical report, 2005
http://www.labri.fr/perso/moot/grail3.html.

[89]

R. Moot, M. Piazza.
Linguistic Applications of First Order Multiplicative Linear Logic, in: Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2001, vol. 10, n^o 2, p. 211–232.

[90]

F. Morawietz.
Two-Step Approaches ot Natural Language Formalisms, Studies in Generative Grammar, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin · New York, 2003.

[91]

C. Muller.
Les bases de la syntaxe – syntaxe contrastive français / langues voisines, Linguistica, Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2002.

[92]

C. Neidle, J. Kegl, D. MacLaughlin, B. Bahan, R. G. Lee.
The Syntax of American Sign Language – Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure, MIT Press, 2000.

[93]

A.-M. Parisot.
Accord et cliticisation: l'accord des verbes à forme rigide en Langue des Signes Québéquoise, Ph. D. Thesis, Université du Québec à Montréal, 2003.

[94]

T. Poussevin, J.-F. Deverge, F. Haiti, A. Herbé.
Traitement Automatique des Langues: analyse syntaxique dans les grammaires catégorielles, Mémoire de Maîtrise – TER, Université Bordeaux 1, May 2003.

[95]

G. K. Pullum, B. C. Scholz.
On the distinction bewteen moedl-theoretic and generative-enumerative syntax, in: Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, LACL`2001, P. de Groote, G. Morrill, C. Retoré (editors), LNCS/LNAI, Springer-Verlag, 2001, n^o 2099, p. 17–43.

[96]

J. Pustejovsky.
The Generative Lexicon, MIT Press, 1995.

[97]

T. Reinhart.
Anaphora and semantic interpretation, University of Chicago Press, 1983.

[98]

T. Reinhart.
Coreference and bound anaphora: a restatement of the anaphora questions, in: Linguistics and Philosophy, 1983, vol. 6, n^o 1, p. 47–88.

[99]

T. Reinhart, E. Reuland.
Reflexivity, in: Linguistic Inquiry, 4 1993, vol. 24, p. 657–720.

[100]

C. Retoré, E. Stabler.
Generative Grammar in Resource Logics, in: Journal of Research on Language and Computation, 2004, vol. 2(1), p. 3–25.

[101]

J. Rogers.
A Descriptive Approach to Language-Theoretic Complexity, CSLI Publications, Stanford, California, 1998.

[102]

E. Stabler.
Derivational Minimalism, in: Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, LACL`96, C. Retoré (editor), LNCS/LNAI, Springer-Verlag, 1997, vol. 1328, p. 68–95.

[103]

E. Stabler.
Remnant movement and structural complexity, in: Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Semantics, G. Bouma, E. Hinrichs, G.-J. M. Kruijff, R. Oehrle (editors), distributed by Cambridge University Press, CSLI, 1999, p. 299–326.

[104]

V. Sutton.
Lessons in SignWriting, 2002
http://www.signwriting.org.

[105]

J. van Eijck, H. Kamp.
Representing Discourse in Context, in: Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam, J. van Benthem, A. ter Meulen (editors), North-Holland Elsevier, 1996, chap. 3, p. 179–237.